Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:32:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291914: fixed in meld 0.9.4.1+20050125-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2005 22:43:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 14:43:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (isengard.vmlinux.org) [213.214.225.58]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CsqSF-0003bC-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:43:35 -0800
Received: by isengard.vmlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 062FDC31A0; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:43:33 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joachim Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: meld CVS could fix many current problems
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:43:33 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: meld
Version: 0.9.4.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
This is just a minor suggestion, you might even already be aware of it,
but here goes. I've been experimenting with trying to "fix" the current
meld in Debian/Sarge, but I gave up and simply checked out the latest
from "branch-0_9" in GNOME CVS.
That one works just perfect for me, and even though I haven't tested all
functions I think that would be a good idea to include in Debian. I've
noticed many other package maintainers do this as well.
If you don't have the time I could probably squeeze in some time to
build a proper[1] CVS deb. What do you think?
Regards
/Jocke
[1] - Shouldn't be too hard, even with my limited knowledge.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages meld depends on:
ii python 2.3.4-5 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-glade2 2.4.1-2 GTK+ bindings: Glade support
ii python-gnome2 2.6.1-1 Python bindings for the GNOME desk
ii python-gtk2 2.4.1-2 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 291914-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 17:35:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 09:35:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtUbM-0008Rq-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:35:40 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtUYE-0005Nn-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:32:26 -0500
From: Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#291914: fixed in meld 0.9.4.1+20050125-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:32:26 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: meld
Source-Version: 0.9.4.1+20050125-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
meld, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
meld_0.9.4.1+20050125-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/m/meld/meld_0.9.4.1+20050125-1.diff.gz
meld_0.9.4.1+20050125-1.dsc
to pool/main/m/meld/meld_0.9.4.1+20050125-1.dsc
meld_0.9.4.1+20050125-1_all.deb
to pool/main/m/meld/meld_0.9.4.1+20050125-1_all.deb
meld_0.9.4.1+20050125.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/meld/meld_0.9.4.1+20050125.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated meld package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 18:31:01 +0100
Source: meld
Binary: meld
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.4.1+20050125-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
meld - graphical tool to diff and merge files
Closes: 287167 291914
Changes:
meld (0.9.4.1+20050125-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Snapshot from CVS (closes: #291914)
- Depends on new libglade (closes: #287167)
* Move to CDBS
* Lower-case the synopsis
Files:
169139ef95f22e24b799d44d285551f6 609 gnome optional meld_0.9.4.1+20050125-1.dsc
8fb994b0d5a1abdc620ac7194899a073 323007 gnome optional
meld_0.9.4.1+20050125.orig.tar.gz
ce3e96dd93a6f4e69075c832909a5ec8 3498 gnome optional
meld_0.9.4.1+20050125-1.diff.gz
4995987fc6a4a7f640bf986dc48a9837 305116 gnome optional
meld_0.9.4.1+20050125-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB9n3DLQnkR9C0M98RAmH5AJ9xktpifnvPBpYLSd53L+vBq1suuwCeKbNU
1LIJbaueMoXraTJQR9QiMeA=
=zT/m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
