Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:47:03 -0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292118: syntax error in /etc/init.d/xfs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 08:29:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 00:29:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ardoisier.int-evry.fr [157.159.110.110]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtM4y-0001Mc-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:29:40 -0800
Received: from chris by ardoisier.int-evry.fr with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1CtM4P-0000rK-5c; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:29:05 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christian Bac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: syntax error in /etc/init.d/xfs
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.6
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:29:05 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xfs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
syntax error at line 24 modify as follow
24c24
< if [ -e $SOCKET_DIR -a ! -d $SOCKET_DIR ] ; then
---
> if [ -e $SOCKET_DIR && ! -d $SOCKET_DIR ] ; then
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages xfs depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 292118-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 10:47:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 02:47:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail0.avcosystems.co.uk [195.224.236.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtOET-00020m-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:47:37 -0800
Received: from lexx.avco ([192.168.0.1] helo=andromeda)
by mail0.avcosystems.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian))
id 1CtODw-0007y7-9r; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:47:05 +0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christian Bac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#292118: syntax error in /etc/init.d/xfs
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:47:03 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4922.1500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4939.300
X-AVCO-Scan-Signature: a4171557ad3abf8f56120b889113e8d3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Tuesday, January 25, 2005 8:29 AM, Christian Bac
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> syntax error at line 24 modify as follow
> 24c24
> < if [ -e $SOCKET_DIR -a ! -d $SOCKET_DIR ] ; then
> ---
>> if [ -e $SOCKET_DIR && ! -d $SOCKET_DIR ] ; then
The line as you've quoted it doesn't exist in 4.30.dfsg.1-10. It was
modified in that version to read (correctly):
if [ -e $SOCKET_DIR ] && [ ! -d $SOCKET_DIR ]; then
(Actually, the line as you've quoted it didn't exist in -9 either, as the
broken version had a ] that yours doesn't).
Closing this report (I would merge it with the previous reports, but they're
already archived so that's not possible).
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
