Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:34:38 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libxslt1-dev: Uninstallable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2005 23:44:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 15:44:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CsrPO-0006ZX-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:44:42 -0800
Received: from user2-182.utsc-res.utoronto.ca ([127.0.0.1]) [142.151.173.182]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CsrPO-0004xU-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:44:42 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stian Haklev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libxslt1-dev: Uninstallable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:44:36 -0500
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libxslt1-dev
Version: testing
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I cannot install this, it says it depends on libgcrypt11-dev, which cannot
be installed. libgcrypt11-dev depends on libgcrypt11 1.2.0-4, and it says
1.2.0-6 to be installed. This is on a pretty new testing configuration,
where all the packages have been gotten through apt-get, testing.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
en_US)
Versions of packages libxslt1-dev depends on:
ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Development Librari
pn libxml2-dev Not found.
pn libxslt1 Not found.
ii pkg-config 0.15.0-4 Manage compile and link flags for
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 291927-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2005 03:34:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 19:34:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Csuzw-0002KO-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:34:40 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4CE89172286; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:34:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:34:38 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libxslt1-dev: Uninstallable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> I cannot install this, it says it depends on libgcrypt11-dev, which cannot
> be installed. libgcrypt11-dev depends on libgcrypt11 1.2.0-4, and it says
> 1.2.0-6 to be installed. This is on a pretty new testing configuration,
> where all the packages have been gotten through apt-get, testing.
No, you've broken your system's configuration by installing a version of
libgcrypt11 that has never been in testing. You will need to downgrade
libgcrypt11 to the version in testing before you can install the matching
libgcrypt11-dev package.
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB9GzKKN6ufymYLloRAn14AJ4lDhO1Ph4t4xrxB13D4NUxnqvxrQCgtkIp
9MklIrF30SKzqljetT4OieM=
=DCDI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
