Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:06:50 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU of perdition 1.15-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2005 22:48:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 18 14:48:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.60]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cr29E-0000b2-00; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:48:28 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CC1419811E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:48:27 +0100 (MET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0EF19800E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:48:27 +0100 (MET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id E3E2426136; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:48:26 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:48:26 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: perdition: FTBFS: Using non PIC code in shared lib.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: perdition
Version: 1.15-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build because it's contains
non PIC code. Here is an extraction from the log file:
gcc -shared .libs/perditiondb_daemon.o .libs/unix_socket.o -ldb -L/build/buil
dd/perdition-1.15/perdition/db/daemon -lperditiondb_daemon_packet -Wl,-soname
-Wl,libperditiondb_daemon.so.0 -o .libs/libperditiondb_daemon.so.0.0.0 -ldb -L
/build/buildd/perdition-1.15/perdition/db/daemon -lperditiondb_daemon_packet
/usr/bin/ld: /build/buildd/perdition-1.15/perdition/db/daemon/libperditiondb_da
emon_packet.a(packet.o): relocation R_PARISC_DPREL21L can not be used when maki
ng a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/build/buildd/perdition-1.15/perdition/db/daemon/libperditiondb_daemon_packet.a
: could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[5]: *** [libperditiondb_daemon.la] Error 1
It's saying that packet.o is build without -fPIC.
Please note that static libs need to be build without -fPIC and
shared libs with.
Kurt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 291132-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2005 08:07:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 20 00:07:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from koto.vergenet.net [210.128.90.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CrXLK-0008Pu-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:07:02 -0800
Received: by koto.vergenet.net (Postfix, from userid 7100)
id 40A293413A; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:47:53 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:06:50 +0900
From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU of perdition 1.15-5
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Cluestick: seven
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Not sure why this was flaged as an NMU.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:18:23PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > tag 291132 + fixed
> Bug#291132: perdition: FTBFS: Using non PIC code in shared lib.
> Tags were: sid
> Tags added: fixed
>
> > quit
> Stopping processing here.
>
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
>
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
