Your message dated Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:22:31 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290828: gpsd: Version in Sid contains security related
bugfixes...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 01:13:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 17:13:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mxout.hispeed.ch (smtp.hispeed.ch) [62.2.95.247]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CqLSg-00059m-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:13:42 -0800
Received: from holly.subnetz.org (217-162-24-227.dclient.hispeed.ch
[217.162.24.227])
by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0) with ESMTP id
j0H1DeVd006487
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:13:40 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by holly.subnetz.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A66F208001E;
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:13:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from holly.subnetz.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (holly [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 10369-01; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:13:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (mother.subnetz.org [192.168.5.3])
by holly.subnetz.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E852098D4F;
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:13:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 50EFE9F1ED; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:13:39 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tilman Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gpsd: Version in Sid contains security related bugfixes...
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:13:39 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at subnetz.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gpsd
Version: 2.7-2
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
... and should migrate to Sarge ASAP. I missed the opportunity to
set urgency to 'high' with the last upload, but will do so on the next
one. In the meantime, I'll tag this report sarge,security to document
the problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages gpsd depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- debconf information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 290828-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2005 11:22:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 18 03:22:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CqrRR-0005zI-00; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:22:33 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EB7E1A30D0; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:22:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:22:31 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tilman Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#290828: gpsd: Version in Sid contains security related
bugfixes...
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 11:29:55AM +0100, Tilman Koschnick wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 19:12 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > I missed the opportunity to set urgency to 'high' with the last uploa=
d,
> > > but will do so on the next one.=20
> > Please do *not* re-upload just to change the urgency. Version 2.7-1 has
> > already built on all architectures, and the release team can bump the
> > urgency for you on the existing package for purposes of testing propaga=
tion.
> > I have already done this, so gpsd should move into testing tomorrow.
> Great, thanks. I wasn't sure what the best approach was, and my sponsor
> recommended increasing the urgency of the next upload as one option.
> 2.7-2 is coming anyway, it contains a couple of other fixes.
Ok. In the meantime, 2.7-1 has hit sarge, so I think this bug can be
closed.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB7PF0KN6ufymYLloRAqePAKCbdElJaQMH6dtWqoDxPfeJH70OPwCfRHHy
pe74BJQCijcpwi1lHlj2aRg=
=lKRE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
