Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 04:54:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2004 08:49:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 05 00:49:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213-84-114-29.adsl.xs4all.nl (tofu.mamane.lu) [213.84.114.29]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cas5D-0002ss-00; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:49:31 -0800
Received: from master by tofu.mamane.lu with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Cas5B-0000yA-Qw
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 09:49:29 +0100
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 09:49:29 +0100
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: i386 install report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux
X-Request-PGP: http://www.mamane.lu/openpgp/dh4096.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: daily on 5 Dec 2004
uname -a: <The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt>
Date: 5 Dec 2004, 09:32 am
Method: netboot, then tiscali.be mirror
Machine: IBM Thinkpad X40
Processor: Intel Pentium M LV 1200MHz
Memory: 512MB
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
No lspci available in the installer's shell, but see bug 275506, it is
about the same machine. (According to IBM's warranty repair, they
replaced only the hard disk, so should give the same lscpi output.)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [ ] (machine has no CD drive)
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [E]
Partition hard drives: [ ]
Create file systems: [ ]
Mount partitions: [ ]
Install base system: [ ]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
Comments/Problems:
The 2.6 install option uses mismatching kernel and modules.
I booted with "linux26". hw-detect tries to load piix for 'Intel
Corporation 82801DBM', but this fails:
ide_core: disagrees about version of symbol dma_alloc_coherent
ide_core: Unknown symbol dma_alloc_coherent
(the same with dma_free_coherent)
Then a bunch of "Unknown symbol"s for piix, usb-storage, via82cxxx,
trm290, triflex, slc90e66, sis5513, siimage, serverworks, sc1200,
rz1000, pdc202xx_old, pdc202xx_new, opti621, ns87415, hpt34x,
generic, cy82c693, cs5530, cs5520, cmd64x, atiixp, amd74xx, alim15x3,
aec62xx, ide-generic, ide-disk,.
Hence, the hard disk is not found, and installation cannot proceed.
I also tried with ftp.fr.debian.org, same result.
--
Lionel
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 284284-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2005 09:52:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 13 01:52:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cp1eS-0005N6-00; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 01:52:24 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FEB180A6
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:52:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 314686E0C6; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 04:54:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 04:54:21 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm closing these bugs since the abiname change has been done right now.
--=20
see shy jo
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB5kVMd8HHehbQuO8RAilzAKCbfm23RkwMPxH8vPlMO0FMTeg70ACg4feT
q+nL8cBNH775yJMwclEiLEI=
=CC1P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
