Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:29:15 -0600
with message-id <87mxovrfqc....@raven.defaultvalue.org>
has caused the report #498125,
regarding should work with DocBook more easily
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) bug-gnu-em...@gnu.org
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
498125: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498125
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
[If possible, please preserve 498125-forwar...@bugs.debian.org in any replies.]
"W. Martin Borgert" <deba...@debian.org> writes:
> A common file extension for DocBook files is '.dbk', which is not
> commonly used for any other purpose, at least on Linux.
Though I'm not familiar with the extension myself, I noticed that the
Wikipedia DocBook entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DocBook) also
mentions it. Would it be appropriate to add support, presumably via
auto-mode-alist and schemas.xml?
The original report,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498125, contains a
patch against the Debian nxml-mode package. It would need some
adjustment to work with Emacs itself.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--- End Message ---
