Your message dated Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:54:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the report #492350,
regarding Builds probably invalid Japanese document
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Benoit Guillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
492350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492350
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Benoît,
I want you to inform about dblatex Debian bug reports #492350 [1],
#492365 [2] and #492366 [3]. They seem to be really good examples why
the planned XeTeX fontspec encoder is needed.
Some short explanations to Martin:
To handle the problem of documents with non-western languages or even of
multilanguage documents, a configuration possibility is planned for
dblatex which enables it to define which fonts to use for specific
Unicode character ranges. Thus it would be possible to adapt dblatex to
the fonts shipped with Debian. E.g. no more hardcoded cyberbit font,
but whatever its free Debian equivalent is. However it will be a
tedious task to determine which fonts to use for all those languages
that are needed by dblatex users, a task where I appreciate any help I
can get ;-) In the end dblatex's language support should have been
improved considerably by this development (and your bug reports should
have been solved).
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/492350
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/492365
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/492366
Regards, Andreas
--
Andreas Hoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: 1024D/B888D2CE
A4A6 E8B5 593A E89B 496B
82F0 728D 8B7E B888 D2CE
pgpMBosI80oXt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
