Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:46:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #386825,
regarding please rsync with newer ubuntu package
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Lukas,
I just got a ping about libloki: #386825. Do I remember correctly
that you were going to adopt the package for Debian as well?
It would be great if you could keep the Debian and Ubuntu packages
in sycn and maintain it for Debian (I'll sponsor anytime if needed).
Thanks,
martin
----- Forwarded message from Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Package: libloki
Version: n/a
hi,
i'm seeing that the libloki debian package is lagging behind upstream and
ubuntu developers. is there any particular reason or this package may be
considered orphaned or up for adoption?
regards
domenico
----- End forwarded message -----
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"perhaps debian is concerned more about technical excellence rather
than ease of use by breaking software. in the former we may excel.
in the latter we have to concede the field to microsoft. guess
where i want to go today?"
-- manoj srivastava
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
--- End Message ---
