Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:04:32 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #324938,
regarding xpfdtops problem converting A5 page size pdf
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324938-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2005 23:05:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 24 16:05:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from risingsoftware01.propagation.net [66.221.33.65] (Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E84Is-0001No-00; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:05:06 -0700
Received: from c220-237-185-173.eburwd5.vic.optusnet.com.au ([220.237.185.173] 
helo=noddy.cloud.net.au)
        by risingsoftware01.propagation.net with esmtpsa 
(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
        (Exim 4.50)
        id 1E84Ir-00063N-94; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:05:05 -0500
Received: from hamish by noddy.cloud.net.au with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1E84IK-00049S-Ae; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:04:32 +1000
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:04:32 +1000
From: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#324938: xpfdtops problem converting A5 page 
size pdf]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi Derek,

A Debian user reports problems converting an A5 size PDF to PostScript.
Firstly, I notice that Xpdf won't accept "-paper A5", saying it's
invalid.

Secondly, our user expects that an A5-size PDF will print to A5-size
paper automatically. My understanding is that Xpdf will always print to
the default or specified paper size, not to something read from the
source PDF. Is this correct?

thanks,
Hamish
----- Forwarded message from "Fernando M. Maresca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

Subject: Bug#324938: xpfdtops problem converting A5 page size pdf
Reply-To: "Fernando M. Maresca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:42:13 -0300
From: "Fernando M. Maresca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
        DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4

Package: xpdf-common
Version: 3.01-1

Filename: pool/main/x/xpdf/xpdf-common_3.01-1_all.deb

This bug seems similar to bug #295685, wich was sent to cups and
reasigned to xpdf.

Problem: printed A5 page size .pdf file trhu cups produces an A4 page
size with centered A5 pdf in it. cups uses pdftops to convert to .ps and
the same problem appears printing from within xpdf-viewer and manually
converting the .pdf:

homero:~$ pdftops a.pdf a.ps
homero:~$ lp a.ps

This is reproducible in out of the box Debian stable/testing machine with:
xpdf 3.01-1
cups 1.1.23-11
cupsys-driver-gutenprint 4.3.99+cvs20050813-1
Epson c43/c5 printers (sorry, I don't have any other printer)

and the .pdf file attached to this report, or the ones downloaded from:
http://unix12.fzu.cz/ep2ds14/original/downlfr.html

If the .pdf is converted using pdf2ps then the printed page is ok, so I
think this is not cups related.



-- 
Fernando M. Maresca
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cel: 221 15 545 8196
Tel: 221 489 8196



----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to