Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:18:06 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #310051,
regarding subversion: svn diff ignores deletion of subdirectories
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 310051-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2005 00:18:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 09 17:18:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcp05454496pcs.sandia01.nm.comcast.net (balefire.icecavern.net)
[68.35.95.14]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DgXE7-0002rx-00; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:18:23 -0700
Received: from tonberry.icecavern.net (tonberry.icecavern.net [10.0.0.9])
by balefire.icecavern.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E7F24F32;
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:19:47 -0600 (MDT)
From: "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: icecavern.net
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BUG(?): svn diff ignores deletion of subdirectories
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:18:06 -0600
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
X-Face:
.95z#+;{S%n[}|Y(W7B+OR^vl>goBDBo2]tw9U%eF-a<=?utf-8?q?lYe6W=2E=60Pb=23K=5FRs/=254N/N=3F=5DPjL-=0A=0970vdgeA?=<@qZeK`2mR.a"{|jx"(.06^*zDnlB+_mWzeViNwjY(=?utf-8?q?/!9=7D*e=3BFqS!mI4G=25=5BHoi=26=0A=09!D=7E?=<I-;+(31((?L$Z=!W1HWJ#EkH<)sLq61)iC6|O~xq/c:n*FoixOAw=I,fidJYR::<=?utf-8?q?61=0A=09Q9=2E=7B=5CpYZeYV+jnOeh?=
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart3862010.B8MNG7ZQmC";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--nextPart3862010.B8MNG7ZQmC
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi again,
Again a quick intro: I'm a Debian developer who is helping out with the=20
subversion packages. I'm not the maintainer, bug doing some bug triage. Thi=
s=20
bug was reported recently, and I thought I'd forward it here for your=20
thoughts:
On Sat, 21 May 2005, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> svn diff's output is incomplete, it ignores the deletion of
> directories. Check these two commands, they only differ in the order of
> arguments.
>=20
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ svn diff \
> svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-exim4/exim/tags/4.50-4 \
> svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-exim4/exim/trunk \
> | wc 2>/dev/null
> 6519 40286 293933
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ svn diff \
> svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-exim4/exim/trunk \
> svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-exim4/exim/tags/4.50-4 \
> | wc 2>/dev/null
> 10687 58798 452521
>=20
> Redirecting the outputs to files and comparing their contents with
> lsdiff [1] shows that the former command does not show the information
> about deletion of the debian/exim4-config-medium and
> debian/exim4-config-simple directory trees.
> cu andreas
>=20
> [1] or alternatively using combinediff.
Perhaps this is just misinterpreting intended behavior, but I thought I'd=20
forward this here to get your wise opinions. =3D)
=2D-=20
Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
--nextPart3862010.B8MNG7ZQmC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCqNw/8KmKTEzW49IRAuQfAJ4gddYg2nH1877bibv90JnO/Sk0nACglE0Z
17ydns1oMsXj98PgLvpWQ/I=
=Djbk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart3862010.B8MNG7ZQmC--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
