Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:25:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #269638,
regarding tetex-bin: dvips info page describes debugging options incorrectly
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 269638-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 15:25:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 07:25:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CoNu9-0004nB-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:25:57 -0800
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.103 #184)
id 1CoNtY-000186-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:25:20 +0100
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 11 Jan 2005
16:25:18 +0100
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:25:18 +0100
From: Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#269638: tetex-bin: dvips info page describes debugging options
incorrectly
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.12(0.116/4/2) i686
X-www.distributed.net: OGR-P2: 11 packets (281.63 stats units) [3.77 Mnodes/s]
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X..
2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hi all,
http://bugs.debian.org/269638
We've got that bug report a few month ago. I've tested that with the
teTeX beta 2.99.7 and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bug/269638$ dvips --version
dvips(k) 5.94b
kpathsea version 3.5.3
Copyright (C) 2004 Radical Eye Software.
and still this is wrong. When reading the man page I've got some
other results (not correct either). Yes, that beast states in huge
letters, that it is obsolete, but maybe we can fix the numbers there
too.
Please review the others numbers in the info page too, as I can't
evaluate if these statements are correct.
Kind Regards,
Hilmar
----- Forwarded message from Jonathan Keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Jonathan Keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Jonathan Keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#269638: tetex-bin: dvips info page describes debugging options
incorrectly
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 17:26:29 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
X-Mailing-List: <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/9091
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20011202-7.1
Severity: normal
The info page for dvips lists a series of debug bitmasks for
reporting various information.
The following masks are incorrect:
128 Reads: Config files Actually is: Memory allocation
256 Reads: Partial font enc... Actually is: Config files
512 Reads: Partial font subr.... Actually is: NONE
----- End forwarded message -----
--
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
