On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:43:05 -0500 (EST), "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jald...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > However, I know you probably don't want to hear it, but it turns out that > > 2.0.x series are now considered 'old stable' releases and the new stable > > release is 2.1.1. > > > > It would be great to get 2.1.x moving into debian soon so any issues can > > be ironed out before Wheezy! > > > > I was aware of it but 2.1 is awfully new so I thought it best to stick to > 2.0 for unstable. I'll upload 2.1.x to experimental after I've brought > my other packages up to date. If you or anyone else reading this > want to work on it while you wait for me, be my guest.
Thank you for having me as your guest, I enjoyed my stay uploading dovecot to 2.1.3 in experimental. In the process I also updated the pigeonhole bits to 0.3.0 because a newer version was required for dovecot 2.1. I've been using the 2.0.18 package and it upgraded fine! I've even backported it to squeeze and am running it happily without any problems whatsoever. I hope others find out about this and try it out so we can have a much more modern version come wheezy! happy anniversary, micah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
