On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:34 +0200, Marek Habersack wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:16:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek scribbled: > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:22:55PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > better to have it built from the samba source package? > > > > Is there currently a good way to do that? The tdb-tools package seems to > > include some tools that aren't present in the samba 3.0.14a source/tdb/ > > directory, and the makefile only covers building tdbbackup, tdbdump, and > > tdbtool (tdbtest and tdbtorture appear to be present in the source, but not > > built). > > > > I don't mind building a tdb package out of the samba source tree, but I > > don't really know which tools have to be in it. > It would indeed make more sense to build the package from the samba sources > now. The tools that are, IMHO, required to be present in the package are the > ones built by samba by default, tdbtest and tbtorture are quite optional and > could be included just for completness. So, the approach would be to get the libtdb building code from sf.net, and add it to the already too many patches in Samba for debian. Then work with jra and jerry on making this upstream, if it can be done portably. I can't imagine building the other utilities will be a big pain. The tricky bit might be deciding to use the separate makefile or the main build system. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc. http://suse.de Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
