Hi, On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:41:26 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2012-03-12 21:31, Niels Thykier wrote: > > hd -n 1 -s 7 -e '/1 "%02d"' > Actually, make that hexdump -n 1 -s 7 -e '/1 "%02d"'. Apparently, "hd" > and "hexdump" are not as interchangable as I thought.
I can confirm that it works on sparc and i386. However, I would suggest to use this: hexdump -n 1 -s 7 -e '/1 "%u"' In contrast to hd, I do not see a difference when specifying the field width "02" here. Using "%u" instead of "%d" will work with values >127. "%d" is signed and will print negative values if the class version is >127. But since we are far away from that anyway, it is probably a matter of taste. For now both versions produce the right result. > ~Niels Best regards Kai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
