Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mit, 28 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote: >> > For more than 5 weeks no answer. How do we proceed with this? We should >> > think about something rather soon, as with teTeX 3 going into unstable >> > texinfo is broken. >> >> I think we do it rather now, than when I'm busy with uploading teTeX >> 3.0. Is the patch you posted to the bug log still up-to-date wrt to the >> version on http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/texinfo/? > > Yes it is. But: > > lintian spits out: > W: texinfo: binary-without-manpage texi2pdf
There is a manpage in the sources of teTeX 2.0.2 (and thus in the sid Debian package, or on http://cvs.debian.org/*checkout*/tetex-bin/texk/tetex/texi2pdf.man?rev=1.1.1.2&cvsroot=tetex&content-type=application/x-troff-man > W: texinfo: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:3 '[ "$1" = > "configure" -a ' - if [ "$1" = "configure" -a -z "$2" ] ; then + if [ "$1" = "configure" ] && [ -z "$2" ] ; then > E: texinfo: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file > W: info: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:3 '[ "$1" = > "configure" -o ' - if [ "$1" = "configure" -o "$1" = "upgrade" ]; then + if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "upgrade" ]; then > E: info: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file > > What the hell is this stupid old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file error. Doesn't lintian tell you more with "-i"? web.ask.com pointed me to ,---- Lintian report for old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file | | The /usr/share/doc/pkg/copyright file refers to the old postal | address of the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The new address is: | | Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, | MA 02111-1307, USA. | `---- Of course this is an upstream issue, just as the manpage. > But what is with the bashism?! That test or [ understands boolean operators is specific to bash, or at least it isn't guaranteed by POSIX and probably not implemented in the test builtins of dash and posh. > Do you accept it like this? Or should I prepare a new 0.1. We're not really in a hurry; I'd say fix them first. > And: Did we come to the conclusion that I write myself as teh new > Maintainer or that I make a NMU upload? In fact we were always talking about taking over. So it's gonna be 4.8-1, with you as the maintainer and your signature in the changelog file. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
