Thanks for this. My thinking has been that the client and server really just sit there, linked with the same libraries, and it would be silly to split them into two separate packages. (It is true that the client pulls in openssh-client, but that also just sits there and is relatively small.)
But I am new here and if the weight of Debian opinion is otherwise, I do not feel that strongly about it. On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:42 AM, martin f krafft <madd...@debian.org> wrote: > Package: mosh > Version: 0.96a-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Subject says it all. I do not need/want the client on all hosts that > I want to become mosh-servers. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: wheezy/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > Versions of packages mosh depends on: > ii libc6 2.13-27 > ii libgcc1 1:4.6.3-1 > ii libio-pty-perl 1:1.08-1+b2 > ii libprotobuf7 2.4.1-1 > ii libstdc++6 4.6.3-1 > ii libutempter0 1.1.5-4 > ii openssh-client 1:5.9p1-3 > ii zlib1g 1:1.2.6.dfsg-2 > > mosh recommends no packages. > > mosh suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > > > -- > .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects: > : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info > `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org > `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
