David MENTRE <dmen...@linux-france.org> writes:
> Hello,
>
> 2012/3/9 Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-...@web.de>:
>> I found myself in a situation where I needed to fill in a dummy Sha1.t
>> into a record to initialize an array. I didn't want to use an Sha1.t
>> option because the value is only every invalid during initialization
>> and an option type would mean extracting from "Some x" at every other
>> place.
>>
>> The attached patch adds a Sha*.zero value that can be used for this
>> purpose.
>
> Why don't you define this Sha1.zero value in your code and use it
> there? This patch seems to me very specific to your code and of
> dubious use in a library.
>
> Best regards,
> david
I can't because the Sha1.t is abstract.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
