On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:47:45AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > At the end, I did work on the packaging of openvswitch.
Thank you very much! I converted your patches to a series of commits and sent them out to ovs-dev for review. I believe that you are CCed on most of them, but you can view the whole series in the ovs-dev archives (search for "00/15"): http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-March/thread.html > I have attached a patch which removes most lintian warnings and errors. > Please apply it, but before you upload, I would strongly suggest that > you do some functional tests, to make sure that I didn't break anything > (especially your init scripts, since I didn't understand the goal of > your double dh_installinit calls). Hmm, I see that my patch wasn't quite right in this area. I'll refine that one. > Now, the only remaining lintian issues are: > - no-upstream-changelog (this one can be ignore, IMO) I think I'll ignore this one. > - W: openvswitch-switch: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry > usr/share/man/man5/ovs-vswitchd.conf.db.5.gz (please fix it...) I fixed this one. > - I: openvswitch source: debian-watch-file-is-missing (it'd be great to > have a watch file: where's your upstream tarball located?) I'll work on this too. Thanks. I dropped some of the changes related to openvswitch-datapath-dkms because the lintian warnings are false positives: none of the files that it calls out for warnings are actually used by the DKMS build, which only actually builds the "datapath" directory. I need to work on a proper fix, which would omit all those useless files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
