>On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:11:08PM +0100, Francesco Potortì wrote: >> If I activate validation for a cell where accepted values are from a >> list, the menu showing the list values is as wide as the cell itself. >> >> There are cases, however, where this is not reasonable, and the >> width should be the one of the widest list item. >> >> In fact, when I set a cell to contain text that is longer than the >> cell's width, either because the text spills over the cell on the right, >> or because of text wrapping in the cell, then the text in the dropdown >> menu becomes truncated and unreadable. >> >> I do not observe this problem in Gnumeric, which, apparently, makes the >> menu as wide as the widest entry in the list. > >Try in a supported and feature-wise development version.
I use Debian testing. It would be currently unfeasible to me trying a more recent version until it goes to testing. So for me the choice is among reporting against what I use or not reporting at all... >*Any* wishlist bug against 3.4.5 does not make any sense) Hm. I was betting against the problem having already been corrected. In fact, if I am not wrong, your statement implies that "normal" users cannot ask for new features. By using Debian testing I would place myself among "advanced" users, yet I do not use the latest version of Libreoffice. >And still it would be better to file such stuff upstreasm, as them and only >them will eventually implement it. I won't. I use the Debian reporting system mainly because it is far quicker for me and I hope that the Debian maintainer pushes significant reports upstream. Anyway, what you say holds for any package: do you mean that wishlist bugs reported in Debian are only meaningful if they are related to Debian packaging issues? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
