-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 07:53:24PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Simon, > > YES!!!! > > If only you knew how many hours I've stared at that code, convinced that > it had to be a simple typo because the logic was perfectly in order for > the other ones. > > Thank you, thank you, thank you! Please remind me that I owe you a > bewerage of choice and a cookie, when/if we meet IRL. :-D
Hi Jonas, You're welcome, glad I could help ;-) Took me a while to find it too, those typos are hard to spot. > Yes, I intend to do that. I looked at Raphaels comment but those other > variables seem more like a _different_ way to extend make variables that > I fear clash with CDBS and is not necessary. But let's discuss that at > that bug, not here... Great, thank you. Regards, Simon - -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPV+cfAAoJEJL+/bfkTDL58Q0P/2S/kzbrebRCF2bPntBdaqTn jAkmzriNI8q+4/nHoJZ4t/d8yA+kGX9PJuzaTDqsxhLkzPlcci/soB8rmZZjDc0R z7cm/g17MOwWG9V98bv1dsatVGNHA0MyHtoX457i32Hb4OY4dR8iZPVnVJr9iThW SIXgHceRH6UCEF1EQhaPGSLJEIot78W6bN48tBnPPKm4cZLJpvGSI7rccx5TvRdD W91fM5ZTESebtYfOGNWjUTmV9jhso6PCGvz3/ZaQGtxN0NL2b55s06hyKETF3TNA 0p9YHiUPaynKs9IICIDx1sFMsNBeeQtHsODkso8FFWbk2ZUk1St+1+QoBe+N5pdT /8hY78S4U3STQgGKl/j2p9WqyMEBjABAy/DRLbh8I++dTIj4ksxkY0BOzkeCwYQW XLAT1Z8dNwBnfploehi/Zqk0p3zLuOFszdqopClgT29uGj7kxaUCw5WCTiFnMRoV GClp89rWuIia5UgiNUhAtGu37mKL6XrPeGmDpHEmncpPnorVwXGs0WkVoOpayV6i pT0yroCJLBxEGa8Jf4mMTryqZHfKL9Qfep/POp8STheTfV3eqmv4qZTrYD02Us6E PHqLKdBESC0IHjxerisGYBc/tdu6I8+Hn4TjBPw7ADoNxN9ntb1iqGoMqJKWcvBt /H0avOF/4jxi48xQxtsZ =H+t7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
