what would not work? disabling blosc? it would work I bet and thanks for testing on a sparc64 system
I just hoped that someone (upstream?) could find a chance to resolve it "properly" ;) > On 03/03/2012 09:47 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > are "going" across platforms? or should we may be adopt blosc > > disabling patches from Julian first.... > > sparc issue is still not resolved AFAIK > > I have pushed a tiny fix for typos with a close statement for 661287 > > (CCed now) (if I got it right on what we are closing now ;) ) > you will have to disable blosc if you want it to build on all arches, I > did not look into fixing blosc as its more complicated and its probably > performance critical code where adding slow hacks to remove unaligned > accesses will likely break the whole benefit of it. > This will have to be done upstream. > I built the ubuntu package on a sparc64 and it succeeded, from the logs > it looks like the same issue as arm's (unaligned memory access). > What makes you think it won't work? -- =------------------------------------------------------------------= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
