On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 07:36:00AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > To help you out, here's the patch which I would have used for an NMU. > Please feel free to use all of it...or only the l10n part of it.
Hi, the patch was not required as all the changes are already in SVN. I wonder however... > diff -Nru netselect-0.3.ds1.old/debian/po/bg.po > netselect-0.3.ds1/debian/po/bg.po > --- netselect-0.3.ds1.old/debian/po/bg.po 2012-02-18 19:17:11.420989838 > +0100 > +++ netselect-0.3.ds1/debian/po/bg.po 2012-02-21 07:31:02.586481533 +0100 > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > "PO-Revision-Date: 2007-01-10 09:53+0200\n" > "Last-Translator: Damyan Ivanov <d...@debian.org>\n" > "Language-Team: Bulgarian <d...@fsa-bg.org>\n" > +"Language: bg\n" > "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" > "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" > "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" This change (as well as other changes to the language) are OK for me but are not reflected in the changelog. ¿Have you done this manually yourself or was it some tool? Regards Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
