On 03/01/12 14:03, Brian Potkin wrote:
Followup-For: Bug #658004


https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-pdf/+bugs

The really interesting discussion is in #820820 but you'll want to read
#942866 too. The essence is that desktop applications output in PDF and
jobs from lp/lpr are converted to PDF by CUPS. The extra processing by
cups-pdf with Ghostscript may produce a less than optimal PDF.

I am aware that some desktop applications output in PDF - but not all (CUPS-PDF is not developed specifically for Linux). So I cannot assume a PDF workflow. Furthermore, not re-processing the PDF doesn't allow to change e.g. the PDF version. Finally, if you already have a PDF you like as native output of your application - why not simply use that one?

Regards,
Volker




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to