Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes: > Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I think checkbashisms and posh are an improvement over just suggesting >> bash (and checkbashisms, in particular, is much easier to use), so my >> inclination is to stick with the new wording and leave the further details >> for other tools. > I assume by 'bash' you mean 'dash' above. Yes, sorry. > I would prefer a less specific note: > Checking your script with checkbashisms from the devscripts > package or running your script with an alternate shell such as > posh may help uncover violations of the above requirements. Okay, that seems fine to me. I'll make that change. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
