Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>I disagree. Pax isn't built with large file support (because <fts.h>
>doesn't allow that), so even if eglibc is fixed, pax would need to be
>fixed. Blocking bug should be used instead.
Right, I could have thought of that.
>The problem is not having fts_read64, but having a different FTSENT
>structure.
The structure is changed along with the functions called.
Hrm, I think if users of this pass FTSENT pointers around
among themselves, this could indeed lead to problems. Damn.
How about providing a libfts64? (Or, more generic, a library
where everything where this is an issue has been built with
a 64-bit off_t)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
a peeing section in a swimming pool.”
-- Edward Burr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
