Hi Niels, Good to hear from you.
Thank you for your reply.
On Monday 27 February 2012 22:37:36 Niels Thykier wrote:
> Thanks, though if you are talking about "java-propose-classpath", I
> believe you want to thank Matthew Johnson. :)
Thanks! :)
> On a related note, I would love for jh_depends to be smarter and
> generate ${java:Depends} based on the actual usage[0]. Actually, I
> believe I have some code somewhere that might could be useful for this.
>
> [0] Including checking for useless/overlinking and erroing out if
> classes are missing etc.
I like this idea. :)
> While I do not have time right now to give it a detailed review, I hope
> we can use it (partly or even fully).
Either way would be fine, I will be happy if you manage to use any part.
> > P.S. Please don't worry about license compatibility because for javatools
> > I give permission to use GPL-2+ license.
>
> I appreciate the gesture, but I cannot accept it[1]. It is possible
> that we could bump the license of the existing javatools code to GPL-2+
> or alternatively, I can also accept an unconditional GPL-2+ license on
> your code.
My bad, I overlooked this paragraph in social contract - sorry.
Of course unconditional GPL-2+ is fine: I hereby grant permission to use this
code under GPL-2+ license.
I reckon it will be better to attach the script with updated license to avoid
any doubts. [attached]
All the best,
Dmitry.
listdeps-jar.sh
Description: application/shellscript
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
