On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 12:20 +0000, Robert Millan wrote: > 660403: cdparanoia: FTFBS on kfreebsd-* > -> Unless there's further activity I recommend removing of kfreebsd-* > binaries from testing. See > http://bugs.debian.org./cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660403#12
That doesn't work. The choices would be removing the kfreebsd-* binaries from unstable, and letting that propagate, or removing the entire package from testing. > 660397: qpxtool: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* > 660401: dvd+rw-tools: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* > -> (eglibc bug) Tagged pending by maintainer since 20th Feb. Should it > be NMUed? CCing maintainer. That's still less than a week. Aurelien, are there any plans for an upload in the near future? > 660396: sane-backends: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* > -> (kfreebsd-kernel-headers bug) Fixed today in 0.75. BinNMU? They were already binNMUed, that's how I discovered the bug. ;-p I'll give them back with a dependency on the new k-k-h. btw, http://bugs.debian.org/src:kfreebsd-kernel-headers still lists two outstanding RC bugs. You need to use versioned -done mails, not just add fixed versions. There's also mednafen and xine-lib, which I think have transitive dependencies via libsdl1.2? The latter still seems to be FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64, despite the patch from #659615 being applied. I've just given it back for one last try. fwiw, there's a possibility that vlc might be a blocker, given that the new upstream version is FTBFS on multiple architectures (including kfreebsd-*). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
