On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:26:51PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:24:58PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:34:20AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > First because having more than one shared lib per binary package is a > > > recipe for trouble down the road. Second, the c++ libs were only built > > > with the serial libhdf5 variant, not with any of the mpi ones; I don't > > > know why, and am not familiar enough with hdf5 to know if that makes any > > > difference. > > > > > > > http://www.hdfgroup.org/hdf5-quest.html#p5thread, > > OK, so this is saying that MPI-enabled HDF5 is not compatible with > C++? Then there wouldn't be a proliferation of packages that I > worried about. >
To say better it is not compatible with upstream C++ supported classes library (for limits in current implementation) :) not C++ in general. Maybe that was clear or not by my previous post. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
