Hi,
* Christoph Anton Mitterer <cales...@scientia.net> [2012-02-20 10:05]:
> I've been just shocked when I went through the patches and saw that one 
> removes
> the usage of /dev/urandom and replaces it by some week seed.

I'm not sure if I can agree with you here. The fact that before the patch the 
code was using urandom doesn't necessarily make it more secure. Actually 
looking at the patch, the code was using a one character seed (0..255) as a 
random seed before. Please see 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333552

Kind regards
Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - n...@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0xA0A0AAAA
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.

Attachment: pgpvivDdi49Sg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to