tags 657417 - patch thanks Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 13:18:03 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > >> tags 657417 + patch >> thanks >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> During the BSP in Paris at IRILL, I prepared an NMU for the pcscada >> package, versioned as 0.7.1-1.1. I did not upload it since I am a >> DM. The patch is attached. >> >> Best, > >> diff -Nru pcscada-0.7.1/debian/changelog pcscada-0.7.1/debian/changelog >> --- pcscada-0.7.1/debian/changelog 2011-11-26 12:27:48.000000000 +0100 >> +++ pcscada-0.7.1/debian/changelog 2012-02-19 13:10:33.000000000 +0100 >> @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ >> +pcscada (0.7.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low >> + >> + * Non-maintainer upload. >> + * Declare conflict between libpcscada0.7.1 and libpcscada0.6, and between >> + libpcscada2-dev and libpcscada1-dev. (Closes: #657417) >> + > > I don't think this is quite correct. Either libpcscada0.6 and > libpcscada0.7.1 are ABI-compatible, and the package name shouldn't have > changed. Or they aren't, and the SONAME should have changed, making > them co-installable. Thanks for your insight. Actually the SONAME was bumped from libpcscada.so.0.6 to libpcsada.so.0.7.1 (as reported by objdump -p). So, assuming that this bump is indeed justified, the solution is therefore to remove the spurious /usr/lib/libpcscada.so.0 symlink contained in both packages. Also, it is unclear to me why the -dev package changed its name. -- Sébastien Villemot Researcher in Economics & Debian Maintainer http://www.dynare.org/sebastien Phone: +33-1-40-77-84-04 - GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
pgpfRQu0av7Q8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
