Great. I was just about to tell (almost) the same, that is that NFS has been rather buggy. So the approach that Steven proposed is probably the best way to go.
// Ola On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 07:13:28PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Version: 2.6.32-31 > > Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > On 16/02/12 00:27, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > >> George Barnett wrote: > > >>> [ 317.916307] Pid: 7838, comm: umount Not tainted 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 > >>> #1 dyomin H8DGU > >>> [ 317.916307] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812ea21e>] [<ffffffff812ea21e>] > >>> _spin_lock_bh+0xe/0x25 > > > >>> [ 317.916307] [<ffffffffa01b97a4>] ? rpc_wake_up_queued_task+0x12/0x29 > >>> [sunrpc] > >>> [ 317.916307] [<ffffffffa01b9835>] ? rpc_killall_tasks+0x7a/0x9b > >>> [sunrpc] > >>> [ 317.916307] [<ffffffffa0217fed>] ? nfs_umount_begin+0x34/0x3a [nfs] > >>> [ 317.916307] [<ffffffff81106844>] ? sys_umount+0x11b/0x2e6 > >>> [ 317.916307] [<ffffffff812ec6a5>] ? do_page_fault+0x2e0/0x2fc > >>> [ 317.916307] [<ffffffff81010c12>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > > > > Hi, > > > > FWIW, I found NFS to be very buggy before the 'feoktistov' version of > > the OpenVZ patchset (introduced in linux-2.6 2.6.32-31); since that > > version I've had no problems of this nature, and I use nfs quite heavily > > between OpenVZ containers. > > Thanks, Steven. Let's go with that. ;-) > -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ---- / o...@inguza.com Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
