Thanks Colin! My only concern with it would be my own use of it on Debian stable which has 8.0.0 (although may be I could progress to backported one or just maintain that backport-specific patch).
Related question -- interested in co-maintaining freeipmi in Debian? I have started preparing for the transition to 1.x series but never got to finalize it... related RFH: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628062 I have pushed all my changes (including debian/TODO) to http://git.onerussian.com/?p=deb/freeipmi.git Cheers, > Package: freeipmi-bmc-watchdog > Version: 0.8.12-3 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch precise > Using 'dpkg-maintscript-helper supports rm_conffile' guards introduces > unreliability into upgrades; it means that the conffile is removed or > not depending on whether dpkg happens to be unpacked before > freeipmi-bmc-watchdog. This seems generally undesirable; it would be > better to enforce a single code path. (This is academic for Debian > because the version of dpkg in squeeze supported > dpkg-maintscript-helper, hence Severity: wishlist; Ubuntu's last LTS > release didn't have a sufficient version of dpkg for that which is why I > care.) -- =------------------------------------------------------------------= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
