On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:29:06AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > On 2012-02-06 19:19, Mark Brown wrote:
> >They are completely incomprehensibe in and of themselves, one needs to > >go find the BTS to figure out what they are. > I was not aware that comprehensibility was a property of numbers. > Numbers are just numbers, there is no need to do anything with the > BTS to figure out what a number is. Oh, come on. Now you're just trolling. > >>>This is actually a bug, see #585110. > >>Do you consider this as non-parsable? > >Yes, it is just a bald assertation which contains no explanation about > >why you believe this to be the case. > If you understood the explanation, I fail to see why you call it > non-parsable. It doesn't contain any actual content about what you're doing, it's adding nothing on top of the otherwise unexplained merge command. > >>This issue does concern me, and I follow this guideline myself, obviously. > >This is not the case, at least not in this example. > Why do you think so? I think I've been perfectly clear - as I've repeatedly said BTS numbers aren't directly parsable and you need to explain what you're doing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
