On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 11:13 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > GDCM 2.2.0 introduces a new ABI, as seen on #655783 and al. > Since API (whatever that means for C++) is preserved, would it be a good time > to > - move gdcm 2.2.0 from experimental to unstable
We've covered that one already. :-) > - binNMU insighttoolkit I've now scheduled that and will look at scheduling the other packages (see http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdcm.html) once insighttoolkit's done. > igstk is not using gdcm API and thus does not required a rebuild What about the other packages which appear to build-depend on gdcm but not end up with a run-time dependency? According to the tracker, that'd be ants, itksnap and vtkedge. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
