Package: maint-guide Version: 1.2.27 Severity: minor
The Debian New Maintainers' Guide uses some strange wording in a sentence: "This document was made using with these two documents as examples:" I find it unnecessary to use both "using" and "with" in that sentence - it could simply be re-written as "This document was made using these two documents as examples:" I am not a native speaker, comments from a native english speaker would be very much welcome. The actual text is found on the first page of the text version of the maint-guide on the debian web page: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/maint-guide.en.txt -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=sv_SE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash maint-guide depends on no packages. maint-guide recommends no packages. Versions of packages maint-guide suggests: ii debian-policy 3.9.2.0 ii developers-reference <none> ii devscripts 2.11.3 ii dh-make <none> ii doc-base <none> ii dput 0.9.6.2 ii fakeroot 1.18.2-1 ii lintian 2.5.4 ii pbuilder 0.206 ii quilt 0.51-1 -- no debconf information
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
