Simon, we are working on getting our mirror up to date and in compliance with what Debian recommends. The kernel.org downtime didn't help :\. A few months ago at least it seemed like their mirror was still incomplete.
Ryan G IT Supertech Limestone Networks, Inc. r.gelob...@limestonenetworks.com www.limestonenetworks.com Simple. Solid. Superior. -----Original Message----- From: Simon Paillard [mailto:spaill...@debian.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:17 PM To: Ryan Gelobter; 633...@bugs.debian.org Cc: netops Subject: Re: Bug#633681: mirror submission for mirror.lstn.net Hi, On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 03:23:04PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:56:23AM -0500, Ryan Gelobter wrote: > > Sorry for the late reply, everything should be fixed now. > > > > Please use http://mirror.lstn.net/debian and > > http://mirror.lstn.net/debian-cd. Disregard debian.mirror.lstn.net > > for all protocols and use mirror.lstn.net. > > > > We are now syncing from mirrors.kernel.org and have been 4x a day. > > The mirror has not been updated since end of october: > http://mirror.lstn.net/debian/project/trace/ Ping. The trace directory is weird, while all files should have a timestamp not than 1 day old. Could you please check logs and use the method we recommend (see http://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror#how ) > > The local trace file is now generated. > > Please use the recommended tool, or make sure you closely rsync use > recommendations (InRelease file especially). -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
