On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:27:00 +0400 Paul Fertser <fercer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Andreas, i do not understand the reasoning for l2tp to be higher in > the list than the link command. I think it's quite common for the more > experienced "ip" users to use the "l" abbreviation instead of the full > "link" command. > > Can you please explain why l2tp should be added before link and not > after so the users of the more popular and older "link" command > wouldn't have to reteach themselves to type more to avoid hitting the > rarely needed l2tp command? > > So my suggestion is to swap the lines to make "link" prioritised to > retain the old behaviour. > > > It was accident already fixed upstream. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
