Sven Joachim, le Sun 29 Jan 2012 14:32:37 +0100, a écrit : > On 2012-01-22 19:28 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Thomas Dickey, le Sat 23 Apr 2011 15:05:50 -0400, a écrit : > >> What's the source for this? The only mach sources I see are for Mach 3.0 > >> at CMU - and the console sequences are much cruder than that used here. > > > > Oops, it seems I have missed this mail. > > > > The source is the GNU Mach, which is a branch of Mach 3.0 developped in > > the GNU project. > > > > Maybe you'd prefer to fork the mach terminfo entry into e.g. mach-gnu? > > It should be fine for us. > > The latest upstream patchlevel has added two new terminfo entries > mach-gnu and mach-gnu-color. Do you need any of those in ncurses-base, > or would it be sufficient to ship them in ncurses-term?
It'd be better to have them in ncurses-base, since that's the raw kernel console. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
