Hi, Thank you for the report.
On 2012-01-27 23:26, micham wrote: > Without this fix I get something like: > > PID USER PRI NI VIRT RES SHR S CPU% MEM% TIME+ Command > 9785 user 20 0 325M 236M 1860 S 0.0 1.5 0:00.12 ./mprime > 9792 user 39 19 325M 236M 1860 R 0.0 1.5 -596523h-14:-8 ./mprime > 9796 user 39 19 325M 236M 1860 R 0.0 1.5 -596523h-14:-8 ./mprime > 9797 user 39 19 325M 236M 1860 R 0.0 1.5 -596523h-14:-8 ./mprime > 9798 user 39 19 325M 236M 1860 R 0.0 1.5 -596523h-14:-8 ./mprime > 9781 user 30 10 325M 236M 1860 S 0.0 1.5 -596523h-14:-8 ./mprime > > After: > > PID USER PRI NI VIRT RES SHR S CPU% MEM% TIME+ Command > 9781 user 30 10 325M 236M 1860 S 0.0 1.5 0:00.01 ./mprime > 9785 user 20 0 325M 236M 1860 S 0.0 1.5 0:00.12 ./mprime > 9792 user 39 19 325M 236M 1860 R 0.0 1.5 2590671h22:11 ./mprime > 9796 user 39 19 325M 236M 1860 R 0.0 1.5 2581130h26:17 ./mprime > 9797 user 39 19 325M 236M 1860 R 0.0 1.5 2562047h47:16 ./mprime > 9798 user 39 19 325M 236M 1860 R 0.0 1.5 2590671h53:17 ./mprime 2590671h is ~295 years. Of course, negative CPU usage time is bad, but this obviously wrong value is no better, is it? > It looks like that there is a bug in the Linux Kernel: Good observation, but why should htop be patched then, if it's a kernel bug? -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
