Hi Yaroslav, hi Frédéric, Il 23/01/2012 21:37, Antonio Valentino ha scritto: > Hi Yaroslav, > > Il 23/01/2012 16:22, Yaroslav Halchenko ha scritto: > > [CUT] > >>> what about providing also a -dbg package as explain here [1] >>> It should help during bug investigation. >> >> I can only +100 on this one -- I have been generating -dbg for packages >> I maintain and with python-awareness of gdb as we have it now -- they >> are indeed indispensable... anyone up for a job? related bugreport is >> #399332 so I am CCing it from now on. >> >> Pretty much it should be quite easy -- just add -dbg to control, I >> think dh would build for those versions, and then in debian/rules you >> would only need to move _d.so into -dbg pkg > > I can take in charge it ... but not before next weekend >
Giving a deeper look to [1] it seems that, in order perform unit tests on the -dbg package, we need to Duild-Depends on python-numexpr-dbg. AFAIK python-numexpr do not provides a -dbg package so I'm not sure how to go on. Probably we could disable build-time unit tests for the -dbg package. Makes it sense? best regards [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Python/DbgBuilds -- Antonio Valentino -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
