Στις 23-01-2012, ημέρα Δευ, και ώρα 19:25 +0100, ο/η Sven Joachim έγραψε: > On 2012-01-22 17:44 +0100, Georgios M. Zarkadas wrote: > > Στις 21-01-2012, ημέρα Σαβ, και ώρα 14:00 +0100, ο/η Sven Joachim > > έγραψε: > >> On 2012-01-16 17:58 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > >> > >> > It seems that we need a migration path to the single md5sums file, ... > >> ... > ... > Another place where the md5sums files are used is the burning facility > if BM_BURNING_CHKMD5 is set to "true". Have you investigated that yet?
Burning was not covered by the initial patch. In that respect the md5 sums test are now broken as a whole due to the patch. I have already made an amendment to fix this, but it will need testing, so it will delay a new release of the package. > > ... > > In the light of this, how about disabling the single md5sum feature in > the next upload and getting it into better shape upstream first? Considering that -although accepted upstream- the patch has not yet appeared in an upstream release, as well as the issues mentioned here, this is the best way to go for the moment. Cheers, George
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part