On 9/24/05, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 24 September 2005 at 20:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > | Package: r-base > | Version: 2.2.0.alpha.20050908-1 > | Severity: important > | > | Hi, > | > | Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following > | error: > | # edd 05 Sep 2005 expand this to R_SHARE_DIR, R_INCLUDE_DIR, R_DOC_DIR > | (cd > /build/buildd/r-base-2.2.0.beta.20050922/debian/r-base-core/usr/lib/R/bin/; \ > | ln -svf ../../../bin/R R; \ > | cd ../../../bin; \ > | perl -p -i -e \ > | 's|^R_HOME_DIR=.*|R_HOME_DIR=/usr/lib/R|;\ > | s|^R_SHARE_DIR=.*|R_SHARE_DIR=/usr/lib/R/share|;\ > | s|^R_INCLUDE_DIR=.*|R_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/lib/R/include|;\ > | s|^R_DOC_DIR=.*|R_DOC_DIR=/usr/lib/R/doc|' R) > | /bin/sh: line 0: cd: > /build/buildd/r-base-2.2.0.beta.20050922/debian/r-base-core/usr/lib/R/bin/: > No such file or directory > | create symbolic link `R' to `../../../bin/R' > | Can't open R: No such file or directory. > | chmod a+x > /build/buildd/r-base-2.2.0.beta.20050922/debian/r-base-core/usr/lib/R/share/sh/echo.sh > \ > | > /build/buildd/r-base-2.2.0.beta.20050922/debian/r-base-core/usr/lib/R/share/sh/help-links.sh > \ > | > /build/buildd/r-base-2.2.0.beta.20050922/debian/r-base-core/usr/lib/R/share/sh/help-print.sh > | chmod: cannot access > `/build/buildd/r-base-2.2.0.beta.20050922/debian/r-base-core/usr/lib/R/share/sh/echo.sh': > No such file or directory > | chmod: cannot access > `/build/buildd/r-base-2.2.0.beta.20050922/debian/r-base-core/usr/lib/R/share/sh/help-links.sh': > No such file or directory > | chmod: cannot access > `/build/buildd/r-base-2.2.0.beta.20050922/debian/r-base-core/usr/lib/R/share/sh/help-print.sh': > No such file or directory > | make: *** [install-arch-stamp] Error 1 > | > | > | I assume that this is not the actual reason why it's > | failing, and that it's something that happened before in > | the log, but I can't find it. > > Could you please look by hand? This very much looks like a local hickup in > the buildd. If you look at the aggregation at > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=r-base > you see that 2.2.0.beta.20050922 built everywhere (but ia64 where the gnome > conf script it calls fell over). > > Not R's bug, and I intend to downgrade this -- unless you can convince that > there is something wrong the package. I have no reason to believe that there > is. The part failing above is also unchanged for many releases.
Is it because the files are going into a directory of the form .../usr/lib64/R/... not .../usr/lib/R/...? I know if I build R from the sources on an amd64 machine I end up with the R library in /usr/local/lib64/R Doug > Dirk > > | The logs are available at > | http://amd64.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=r-base > | > | PS: This is actually from a log of the 2.2.0.beta.20050922-1 > | version, but the 2.2.0.alpha.20050908-1 version looks > | about the same. > | > | > | Kurt > | > > -- > Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty. > -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics' > > >
