On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:51:32PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: > > This gives folks very little to information to work with. If you find > > out more, please update this bug. > > I know, sorry, but I merley wanted to document it, as I found an > solution and the work needing to providing a simple testcase is > outweighting the importance of this, I think.
OK, that's fair. I merely wanted to find out whether it was indeed your intention mainly to document the issue. Sometimes I find a bug reporter is expecting me to debug a deep issue all on my own. ;-) > I *quite sure* that 1.48 does not show this issue, as I put again > several 100 hours of execution-time into it and the hang did not show up > anymore. > So I think it is not worth the effort to dig into deeper or report it > upstream (unless one want to document the issue). I agree that we can leave it as is. Thanks for the extra info: it could come in handy if the issue does reappear in future in some boost version. Cheers, -Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
