Am 07.01.2012 02:42, schrieb Nate Bargmann: > Another reason that gnome-core should not have a hard dependency on > network manager is that nm is simply not ready for prime time. My issue > with it stems from its inability to stream audio via pulse audio to
NM has nothing to do with streaming audio via pulse audio. > another server acting as a sink over wireless without choppiness or > coninuous network drop-outs. network drop-outs might be related to driver issues and NM using different code paths then wicd/ifupdown. NM uses the nl80211 subsystem for wireless devices (where possible) and wicd might still be using a different driver interface. But then, I don't use wicd, so I can't tell for sure. > > As I see it, a recommends of nm, wicd, or whatever to statisfy a network > dependency of gnome-core could be employed to avoid klunky work-arounds > as above or removal of the gnome-core package. > Not convincing arguments. As Joss repeatedly said, meta-packages are not super market. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
