On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:13:01PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 03:50:45PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > So I've uploaded the patch.
> > Looks like this bug wasn't closed, thanks to the typo "Closs: #xxxx" > So closing it now instead. > > Shouldn't "openssl" be Multi-Arch: foreign? > A package with a Depends on openssl should work with any of > the arches as far as I know. So I think think that "foreign" > would do the right thing in that case, but I'm not really sure > enough about it to change it. > Steve, do you have any comment about this? "foreign" is correct for any package that provides only an exec() interface to its reverse-dependencies; however in general I've only been pushing such a change for packages that have actual multi-arch: same reverse-dependencies (i.e., libraries as revdeps), since otherwise it just makes the packages file bigger for no discernable benefit. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
