Hi, I've tested your dovecot file on my server and it works just fine. But I haven't tested it with pop3 logins really. I'll do that tomorrow. Thanks for that quick response. Cheers thorko
On 01/03/2012 08:43 PM, Willi Mann wrote: > Hi! > > Did your patch really work for you? I'm not sure which regex would match > the login lines. > > I've created a different patch that worked on you logfile. Can you > please test it? > > Attached is both the diff and my latest version (as the diff is against > latest upstream SVN, and may not apply cleanly on your machine) > > WM > > > On 2012-01-02 20:29, Thorsten Kohlhepp wrote: >> Hi, >> I've checked the regex and modified a bit to work also with dovecot 1.0. >> I've attached a new patch file. >> Here are also some example logfiles for dovecot 2.0. Sorry but I don't >> have some pop3-logins. >> Cheers >> thorko >> >> On 01/02/2012 07:43 PM, Willi Mann wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> On 2011-12-29 16:33, Thorsten Kohlhepp wrote: >>>> Hi, I've created a patch which works with dovecot 2.0.15 You can >>>> get it here >>>> http://www.thorko.de/assets/public/scripts/logwatch-dovecot.patch >>> Thanks for the patch, but if you are trying to fix bugs related to >>> dovecot 2, then it does not seem to be right to modify the section for >>> handling dovecot 1 messages. Furthermore, the patch should also >>> support the old format of Dovecot 2. >>> >>> Maybe you could send me some example log entries, such that I can >>> produce a fix that I can really include, and that can also be included >>> upstream. (I don't have any dovecot server running, so I need user input) >>> >>> WM >>> >> >> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
