Hi Rene, On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi > > On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 01:21:09PM +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote: >> An initial mail has been sent to pkg-kde-talk mailing list[1] and a wiki >> page[2] is available to track our progress. >> >> The transition could happen once Qt 4.7.4/QtWebKit 2.2.0 migrate to >> testing. Qt 4.8.0/QtWebKit 2.2.1 with multiarch support have been >> uploaded to experimental. Some other packages will be uploaded to >> experimental. > [...] >> [2] http://wiki.debian.org/QtMultiarchTransition > > Why did you only refer to cmake etc. using packages and not for packages > with "normal" ./configure etc.?
In Qt world, "normal" build system are qmake/cmake and are more the most relevant. Software using autotools are most likely always using a custom rule to get Qt related information and build. > Did you try to rebuild them? Especially > if they need stuff like $QT4DIR etc which seems quite common? No, I didn't tried to rebuild these cases. As mentioned, they aren't common, but that's not the point. You're right, I should cover them as well. > At least libreoffice will need the following patch to not FTBFS: > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=blob;f=patches/add-debian-multiarch-support.diff;h=1f008fba369b12dfa2cd5cd24b857c88b7437390;hb=bb597a0f8da425207a09a2986d8e23e36cd99d1c > > (Will cherry-pick.) IMO, this patch is incorrect (and can't be upstreamed btw), you should rely on qmake and in your case and grab the output of `qmake -query QT_INSTALL_LIBS` > Regards, > > Rene Thanks for the reminder, I missed to cover packages using autotools. Cheers, Fathi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
