1. tammikuuta 2012 23.53 Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> kirjoitti: > On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 23:38 +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> Removing the entry is not what was requested. This package still won't >> build on anything else than an x86-32. The request was to add >> non-Linux i386 variants, namely kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386, i.e. >> any-i386. > > Check the subject of the commit in the closing mail: > > [p-a-s/sid] xserver-xorg-video-geode: dropped, specifies any-i386 in dsc > > If the .dsc specifies an accurate architecture list, there's no reason > for P-a-s to say anything about the package. In fact, doing so is > harmful as it means maintainer changes to the architecture list won't > automatically propagate on the buildd side.
Wait... Do you mean that, for as long as the correct architecture is specified in debian/control and, as a result, in the generated .dsc, (in this case, any i386-variant), that no P-A-S entry is needed? Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
