On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:15:43AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > > If binutils-z80 needs a new maintainer, I guess I could do it. I > > have never taken a look at its source code, though. > > Great! I looked at the package briefly. What I can say is, that it > is the very same as the normal binutils package, but it replaces one > file... Sorry can't remember the details anymore. But the rest of > the packaging looks fairly easy.
Okay, I'm a DM but not a DD, so I cannot upload the package directly yet (I've just added the DM-Upload-Allowed flag). I'd be glad if someone could take a look and upload it for me: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/binutils-z80/binutils-z80_2.22-1.dsc A few things: - I tested it and it appears to work fine, at least I can build opense-basic perfectly with it. - I added a watch file, rewrote the copyright file and fixed some other lintian warnings. - I'm closing #634060, #639590 and #652451. The last one is against opense-basic, is it OK if I close it with this upload or should it be closed by other means? - I'm not familiar with this Build-Using thing. I was surprised to see that this package used the original binutils source, but it's not generated from the actual binutils source package. I guess that's to make things easier for the binutils maintainers, isn't it? Can I see where this was discussed to see if there's anything else that I should know? Thanks, and Merry Christmas! Berto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
